CHAPTER 1
is pretty obvious. Were there any personnel injuries or damaged equipment because of violations to the tag-out program? This first method sounds good, but it is not always accurate. The second method (required) really does not take that much time if performed consistently. Use of the second method also will ensure that personnel injuries and equipment damage do not occur. What method are we referring to? It is the audit portion of the program. As a maintenance person you probably were not concerned with the audit portion of the program. That is, unless there was a discrepancy found on an equipment tag-out that you were responsible for. But now as a GS supervisor your responsibilities have changed. You will probably be in charge of a work center, and as you continue to progress you will probably qualify as an EOOW/EDO. Eventually you will be required to know all aspects of the program. Now take a look at how tag-out audits should be conducted. All tag-out logs (records) must be kept in the space(s) designated by your ship’s instruction. Normally, these records for the engineering department will be kept in the central control station (CCS). Supervisory watch standers (EOOWs/EDOs) must review these records as part of the watch-relieving process. Checks and audits of all tag-outs must be conducted every two weeks. However, these requirements may be superseded by your type commander (TYCOM) or even your own ship’s instruction. Remember, just as with PMS, audit frequency can only be increased, not decreased. 1. All outstanding tags listed on the Tag-out Record Sheet must be checked as correctly installed by visual comparison of the information on the tag, the record sheet, and the item on which the tag is posted. when a valve or switch position is prescribed, a visual check that the item is in its proper position is made unless an operation such as removal of a cover, cap, or closure is required. No operation of a valve or switch is authorized as part of a routine tag-out audit. In addition, a spot check of installed tags should be conducted to ensure that tags so checked are effective (that is, covered by an active Tag-out Record Sheet). Report all discrepancies in the check of actual position at once to the EOOW/EDO before proceeding any further with the tag audit. The date, time, discrepancies (including corrective actions), and signature of the person conducting 2. the check is logged on each Tag-out Record Sheet under the last tag listed. When the actual position of a DANGER-tagged valve is in question, the EOOW/EDO, with the specific permission of the responsible department head, if available, may authorize two people to independently check the position of the specific valve(s). NOTE Checking the position of a valve is done only by attempting to turn the valve handwheel/operator a small amount in the SHUT direction. 3. 4. This is an approved exception to the prohibition on operation of DANGER-tagged equipment. This valve position check must be performed using the applicable approved procedures for valve lineup checks. All outstanding Tag-out Record Sheets are audited against the Index/Audit Record section. As part of the audit, each Tag-out Record Sheet is checked as previously specified. The date, discrepancies noted, and signature of the person conducting the audit are logged by a line entry in the Index/Audit Record section of the tag-out log. Checking the installation of instrument labels and auditing the logs must be conducted in the same manner as a tag-out audit. To ensure that tag-out/label procedures are enforced properly, the cognizant department head (engineer officer) frequently checks the tag-out log, notes errors, and brings them to the attention of those responsible. The completed Tag-out Record Sheets and Instrument Logs are removed by the department head (engineer officer) after the review. Remember, a violation of any tag compromises the entire tag-out system and could in itself have serious consequences. All loose tags that have been removed must be destroyed. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM As the Navy and our country progress into the 21 st century, a much needed and stronger emphasis has to be 1-2
placed on environmental pollution control. For us to preserve our environment and our remaining resources, we must all be conscientious participants. The Navy is committed to operating its ships and shore facilities in a manner that is compatible with the environment. It is your responsibility as a supervisor to provide leadership and personal commitment to ensure that your personnel develop and exhibit an environmental protection ethic. Since this program contains such a vast amount of information and guidelines, we will not be able to cover more than a small part of the information. For a more comprehensive look at this program, read OPNAVINST. 5090.1. Due to the large impact of any noncompliance, there are outside activities such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to monitor your program operations. Remember, most environmental statutes impose criminal liability for willful or knowing violations. In some cases, individual service members may be charged with criminal liability if their actions, or inactions, meet the requirements for imposing liability. In the remaining segments of this section we will discuss some training tips and drill scenarios you may wish to use to better acquaint yourself and your personnel with this program. MONITOR PROGRAM OPERATIONS TRAINING AND DRILL EVALUATION Monitoring the environmental pollution control program’s operations is very important. This process can be very time consuming if proper training of all personnel is not done. As previously stated, this is not a one person program. It will take everybody’s efforts This section provides some useful lesson plans, training tips, drill scenarios, and evaluation grading forms for hazardous material spills. Figure 1-1 is a sample lesson plan you can use to instruct personnel on to make it work. response procedures for hazardous materials spills. Figure 1-1.—Sample lesson plan. 1-3
TARGET AUDIENCE: All fire parties, damage control personnel, fire marshals, gas free engineers, gas free petty officers, rescue and assistance details, and command duty officers REQUIREMENT: Initial and annual training, with drill, according to OPNAVINST 5100.19B. INTRODUCTION: There are significant hazards associated with handling hazardous materials under a controlled situation, even more during a spill or emergency situation. A hazardous material spill can be a threat to the safety of the ship, the environment, and personnel. Users can usually handle small spills, less than 5 gallons of low toxicity material. Material safety data sheets (MSDSs) provide spill cleanup information. Larger spills of highly toxic, flammable, or explosive material can cause extensive damage to the ship and personnel injuries. As with any threat to the ship, damage control teams are tasked with responding and handling the emergency. I . BACKGROUND A. The Navy has established the Hazardous Material (HM) Program to provide the precautions and procedures to safely handle these materials. B. Steps must be taken to prevent hazardous material spills from occurring. 1. The HM coordinator, along with the DCA, pinpoint those places aboard ship that are potential spill areas. 2. Potential spill areas include storerooms, stores-handling elevators and conveyers, crane- handling areas, in-use storage areas, sumps and tanks, and certain evolutions, such as UNREP/RAS, when spills may occur. 3. Periodic checking of these areas, especially after heavy weather, may alert you to a spill. 4. Environmental contamination of navigable waterways must be prevented! C. Spillage, or accidental release of hazardous materials, must be handled with the proper protective clothing and with the correct procedures to avoid personnel injuries and damage to the ship. 1. Damage control personnel, CDOs, fire marshals, gas free personnel, and the DCA must be trained in spill response. 2. An annual spill response drill must be conducted. 3. Each member of the damage control team must be aware of the potential hazards of hazardous material spills. They must handle each spill as a special case. The DCA, CDO, or fire marshal will evaluate the spill and instruct team members in cleanup pro- cedures. 4. Spills of oil, OTTO fuel, PCBs, radioactive material, mercury, CHT, and hydraulic fluid are handled by separate instructions. Specialized spill kits are available for each of these items, and trained spill teams generally respond to these types of spills. 5. Damage control personnel may be called upon to respond to spills of paint, thinner, dry- cleaning fluid, lube oil, acid, boiler water and feedwater chemicals, or laundry products. Figure 1-1.—Sample lesson plan—Continued. 1-4
Figure 1-1.—Sample lesson plan—Continued. 1-5
Any personnel injuries or witnesses? How much material is spilled, how many gallons, how many square feet on the deck? e. DCC needs as much information as possible to decide who to send to the scene. For example, a 5 gallon can of paint thinner was dropped down a ladder near a storeroom. The can burst open when it hit the deck. The vestibule has no ventilation and the flammable vapors are building. In response to this spill, the DCA may want to send the entire fire party with charged fire hoses to the scene. The DCA needs specific information to make proper decisions. 2. INITIATION OF ACTION a. The most important initial actions are to evacuate personnel, secure power to the affected area (if material is flammable), and call away a medical emergency for any injured personnel. b. Block off the area until help arrives. c. The DCA, CDO, fire marshal, repair locker leader, scene leader, or other authority will stabilize the situation before thinking about the cleanup. Stabilization may include securing deck drains, securing ventilation, setting spill boundaries, and staging backup personnel. d. Once the situation is stable, injured personnel have been removed and cared for, and there is no immediate threat of fire or explosion, then the authorities can consider their next step. 3. EVALUATION a. The medical department representative and the HM coordinator must have an MSDS for every hazardous material held on board. Each CDO, DCA, fire marshal, and key player must know where to find these MSDSs and how to use them. b. These MSDSs provide specific spill and hazard information for the spilled item. The MSDS will tell if the item is corrosive, gives off toxic fumes, or reacts with nearby sub- stances. In trying to decide how to handle and cleanup the spill, the MSDS informa- tion is critical. c. Part of an evaluation may take place during the initiation of the action phase. The remainder may take place during the next phase of containment and damage control. 4. CONTAINMENT AND DAMAGE CONTROL a. During this phase, the CDO, DCA, fire marshal, or scene leader decides if a Red Devil blower is needed for ventilation, and if any further damage control actions, beyond the initial action, is needed. b. The decisions are made, based on the MSDS, what type of protective equipment is needed, and who will dress-out to approach the spill. c. Barriers of sand, absorbent, blankets, or paper toweling maybe placed around the spill to prevent spreading. d. The gas free engineering petty officer maybe required to determine explosive levels and levels of toxic gas. Figure 1-1.—Sample lesson plan—Continued. 1-6
5. DISPERSION OF GASES AND VAPORS a. Ventilation from the surrounding area, a Red Devil blower, ram fan air mover, or local exhaust system may be used to reduce explosive levels, or to disperse or dilute air con- taminants. b. Take care when exhausting vapors and gases to the weather decks to prevent re-intro- ducing them into the ship. c. The gas free engineering petty officer uses meters and Draeger tubes to check for ventilation. 6. CLEANUP AND DECONTAMINATION a. Once the initial phases are complete, the team can take its time cleaning up the spill and decontaminating the area. Remember that cleanup personnel must be appointed and supervised as they don the required protective clothing. Protective clothing is provided in each ship’s spill cleanup kit, kept in or near a repair locker. Note to the instructor: If your ship has the spill cleanup kit available, breakout the kit and show all the components to the students. Explain the use of each item. b. During cleanup and decontamination, one person supervises the cleanup while the others assist. The DCA, CDO, fire marshal, or scene leader will decide what protec- tive clothing and respiratory protection is required and instruct the team members in the cleanup. 7. DISPOSAL OF CONTAMINATED MATERIALS a. All the spilled material, absorbent, disposable clothing contaminated with the spilled material, and items which cannot be decontaminated are considered used hazardous material. These items must be double-bagged in plastic or placed in an empty drum or barrel and sealed. The material must be labeled with a hazardous chemical label. The material must then be turned over to the supply department for disposal. b. You must decontaminate reusable items, such as rubber boots, dustpans, brooms, and mops before reuse. Place them in a doubled, plastic, labeled bag until you can accomplish the decontamination. The safety officer or the HM coordinator will help decide how to safely decontaminate reusable spill equipment. 8. CERTIFICATION FOR SAFE REENTRY Once the decontamination is completed, the CDO, DCA, or fire marshal inspects the area to be sure the cleanup is complete. If toxic gases or vapors were involved the area also may need to be cleared by the gas free engineer. 9. FOLLOW-UP REPORTS a. The spill response should be logged in the DCC log (Engineering Log) and the ship’s deck log. b. The CDO may want a written report to present to the CO or XO. Give a copy of this memo to the HM coordinator. c. If there was local press interest, or if the spill caused fatalities or excessive damage, an OPREP-3 is probably required. Spills, such as oil, mercury, and PCBs have their own reporting requirements. Figure 1-1.—Sample lesson plan—Continued. 1-7
III. (1) OPNAVINST 5090.1A provides hazardous materials spill response and reporting procedures for spills over the side, in Navy, non-Navy, and foreign ports. Report formats are provided. (2) Any environmentally significant spill requires an OPREP-3 report. d. Mishap reports to the Naval Safety Center are only required if the hazardous material exposure required medical treatment, resulted in five lost workdays, or caused a death. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SPILL DRILLS Hazardous material spill drills must be conducted at least annually. These drills are in addition to the already required mercury spill drills, OTTO fuel spill drills, and others required by separate directives. The drill should be realistic and related to the ship class. The DCTT should develop spill drill scenarios involving the entire fire party. SUMMARY: Hazardous material spills may become damage control situations that threaten the ship and personnel. Damage control parties must be aware that, although similar to other damage control situations, spills may require special handling and precautions because of the chemical involved. Damage control personnel must be trained and drilled to understand hazardous material spill response procedures. FOR MORE INFORMATION CONSULT OPNAVINST 5100.19B, APPENDIX B3-A. SPILL RESPONSE SCENARIOS ARE PROVIDED. SELECT ONE FOR A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL FREQUENTLY USED ON BOARD (MSDS AVAILABLE) OR DEVELOP YOUR OWN DRILL. Figure 1-1.—Sample lesson plan—Continued. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SPILL RESPONSE DRILL SCENARIOS The following sample hazardous material spill response drill scenarios (fig. 1-2) have been collected from several ships. The DCTT should review and discuss these scenarios for applicability to your ship. Each drill should involve as many actions as possible. Walk through the scenario first to train personnel before conducting a complete drill. Each duty section and all CDOs and fire marshals should observe or participate in a hazardous material spill drill. If available, use your ship’s spill response kit. Other scenarios could include a crane delivering a pallet load of paint breaking over the helo deck and spilling; several 5-gallon cans of ammonia floor wax stripper breaking free during heavy weather and spilling in a berthing area; or a 50-pound container of powdered citric acid falling in the engine room and breaking open, spilling the powder into the bilges and over two levels of deck grating. Be creative, but realistic. Gasoline Spill Figure 1-3 is a sample of a training drill scenario and evaluation sample for a gasoline spill drill. This scenario, like all others, should be tailored to meet the needs of your ship. The purpose of this sample is to provide you, the supervisor, a practical way to initiate the drill and to monitor and evaluate your response team’s abilities. Keep in mind, the maximum credit points are arbitrary. You should assign point values based on the importance of each task being performed. 1-8
SCENARIO #l An Engineman is removing a 12-volt battery from the motor whale boat. The boat is on the davit, and the Engineman must carry the battery down the side ladder. As he lifts the battery over to the side of the boat, his glove slips, and the battery falls about 10 feet to the deck below. The battery caps fly off and about 2 quarts of battery acid spill on the deck The acid is flowing toward the deck edge and scupper over the side. A nearby Boatswain’s Mate tries to set the battery up to stop the spill and suffers acid burns on his hands. This spill will involve: —A medical emergency for acid bums —Stopping the spill from spreading —Using baking soda to neutralize the acid around the battery, and using personnel protective equipment to pick it up and bag it —Spreading baking soda and scrubbing the spill area —A fire party to charge hoses and dilute the acid while washing it over the side —Personal protective equipment that would include rubber boots, rubber gloves, a rubber apron, and goggles (a respirator may not be required) The used hazardous material would include the broken battery and any contaminated containment materials. The acid spill should be neutralized before washing it over the side. The alternative is to neutralize with baking soda and absorbing it up with towels, absorbent, or other material. All this would be bagged as used hazardous material. SCENARIO #2 An SK3 went down to the flammable liquid storeroom to break out a 5-gallon can of paint thinner (flash point less than 100 degrees). As he carries this can up the ladder, the handle breaks off the can, and it falls down to the bottom of the ladder. As the can hits, the cap pops off and the contents spill. The vestibule is small and there is no ventilation in the ladder well. The SK3 tries to go down after the can, and while trying to right the can, replace the cap, and cleanup the spill, falls unconscious in the thinner. A sailor in a space above smells the strong vapors and phones DCC to get the fire marshal to investigate. The sailor and the fire marshal find the unconscious SK3 and see the spilled paint thinner in the vestibule. This spill will involve: —Explosive vapors and the need to secure sources of ignition. —A medical emergency with the SK3 overcome by the vapors and skin contact with the chemical. A rescue would require respiratory protection but not an OBA due to flammable vapors. —Ventilating the area with a Red Devil blower. —Calling away the fire party in case of explosion and fire. —Gas-freeing the area. —Dressing out two people in goggles, organic vapor respirators, rubber boots, rubber gloves, and disposable coveralls. —Cleaning up the spill using absorbent, double plastic bagging, and marking the material as used hazardous material. —Decontamination of the area with soapy water. Figure 1-2.—Response drill scenarios. 1-9
GASOLINE SPILL DRILL OBJECTIVE: To train damage control personnel in spill cleanup procedures and equipment use. APPLICABILITY: All SUPPORT SERVICES REQUIRED: None ACCEPTABLE EQUIVALENCY As approved by ISIC REQUIREMENTS: None SCENARIO I: Ship in port. MOGAS piping failure leads to 500-gallon spill in the pump room. SCENARIO II: Ship undervay. Misalignment of valve causes 25-gallon spill through vent into pump room. PROCEDURES: 1. INITIAL PROCEDURES: a. Spill stopped and reported to DCC b. Ship to General Quarters c. Spill reported via OPREP-3, Navy Blue or Unit SITREP, and Oil Spill Report, OPNAVINST. 5090.1 2. DAMAGE ASSESSMENT: a. b. c. Isolate area electrically and otherwise. Break out free-fighting equipment and prepare to combat fire and explosion. Determine gasoline vapor concentration in the air as related to the lower explosive limit. Select protective equipment and clothing based on this finding. 3. REPAIR TASKS: a. Breakout spill cleanup equipment and stage materials in the local area. b. Dress out personnel in appropriate protective equipment provided in the spill cleanup kit. In concentrations above the LEL, self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) should be used, if available, vice OBAs. c. Contain spill using diking materials or other equipment. d. Stage equipment and materials to maximize efficiency separating contaminated materials for final disposal. e. Commence cleanup operations using absorbent pads and other equipment. f. Collect contaminated materials for reuse or segregate for disposal. g. Continue cleaning until no visible sign of liquid is present and vapor concentration levels are below 10 percent of the LEL. h. Containerize contaminated materials in preparation for transportation and disposal. Sealed containers of gasoline contaminated materials may be explosive and highly flammable. The materials should be removed from the ship by the quickest available means including jettisoning overboard. i. Restore unused materials. j. Decontaminate personnel and equipment.. k. Package residual contaminated material for disposal. 1. Stow equipment and unused materials in spill kit and return kit to storage. m. Make follow-up reports via appropriate message. SAFETY: Ensure the safety of all personnel and equipment. Figure 1-3.—Spill drill for gasoline. 1-10
MARKING FACTORS 1. Preparation. Evaluate adequacy of preparation including but not limited to the following: MAXIMUM SCORE CREDIT a. Spill cleanup kit available 5 b. Spill contingency plan available 5 c. Spill cleanup team briefing adequate 5 2. Damage Control Organization: a. Spillage reported efficiently 5 b. Immediate response adequate 20 c. Message notification adequate 5 d. Spill cleanup personnel level of knowledge in: (1) Use of equipment 10 (2) Use of materials 10 e. Speed and efficiency of the cleanup operation 20 f. Safety of personnel throughout all aspects of the 15 operation MAXIMUM SCORE 100 TOTAL SCORE Figure 1-3.—Spill drill for gasoline—Continued. Oil Spill Figure 1-4 is a training scenario and evaluation sample for an oil spill drill. Remember, this is only a sample and should be tailored to suit the needs of your ship. Freon Spill Figure 1-5 shows a sample of a freon spill drill. The purpose of this sample is not to limit you, but to encourage you to create your own viable scenarios. PREPARE REPORTS For all practical purposes, you probably will not be responsible for the actual reports that will be sent to your command’s higher reporting authority. But keep in mind, you probably will be tasked with providing your superiors with the preliminary data. For you to be effective in this task, you should be familiar with the reporting procedures outlined in OPNAVINST. 5090.1 series. ENGINEERING OPERATIONAL CASUALTY CONTROL (EOCC) MANUALS The casualty control portion of the EOSS contains information relevant to the recognition of casualty symptoms and their probable causes and effects. This is also a source for information on actions to be taken to prevent a casualty. The EOCC manuals specify procedures for controlling single- and multiple-source casualties. Casualty prevention must be the concern of everyone on board. Proper training of all personnel must provide adequate knowledge and experience in effective casualty prevention. The EOCC manuals have efficient, technically correct casualty control and prevention procedures. These procedures relate to all phases of an engineering plant. The EOCC documents possible casualties that may be caused by human error, material failure, or battle damage. The EOCC manuals describe proven methods for the control of a casualty. They also provide information for prevention of further 1-11
OIL SPILL DRILL (OVERBOARD) OBJECTIVE: To train damage control personnel in spill cleanup procedures and equipment use. APPLICABILITY: All SUPPORT SERVICES REQUIRED: In port: Port Services punts and oil boom Not in port: None ACCEPTABLE EQUIVALENCY: As approved by ISIC REQUIREMENTS: OPNAVINST 5100.19B requires one drill of this type per year. SCENARIO I: Ship moored at pier inadvertently releases 1,000 gallons of fuel. SCENARIO II: Ship at anchor inadvertently releases 1,000 gallons of fuel. PROCEDURES: 1. INITIAL PROCEDURES: a. Continued spillage stopped b. Ship reports spill via OPREP-3, Navy Blue or Unit SITREP, and Oil Spill Report, OPNAVINST. 5090.1 c. Review the ship’s spill contingency plan d. Brief spill cleanup team 2. DAMAGE ASSESSMENT: a. Determine environmental significance of spill b. Determine volume of spill: (1) Within ship’s capability, clean, designate personnel, break out spill cleanup kit, and launch small boats as necessary (2) Beyond ship’s capability, take immediate action to control spill and request assistance by message from the designated naval on scene coordinator (NOSC) 3. REPAIR TASKS: a. Breakout spill cleanup equipment and stage materials in small boats b. Dress out personnel in appropriate protective equipment provided in the spill cleanup kit c. Launch small boats d. Contain spill using booms or other equipment e. Stage equipment and materials in the small boats to maximize efficiency f. Separate contaminated materials for disposal g. Commence cleanup operations using absorbent pads, skimmers, and other equipment h. Collect contaminated materials for reuse or segregate for disposal i. Continue cleaning until no sheen is apparent on the surface of the water j. Seal contaminated materials in preparation for transportation and disposal k. Restore unused materials 1. Retrieve small boats Figure 1-4.—Spill drill for oil. 1-12
m. Decontaminate personnel and equipment n. Package residual contaminated materials for disposal o. Stow equipment and unused materials in spill kit and return kit to storage p. Make follow-up reports to NOSC via appropriate message formats in OPNAVINST 5090.1 SAFETY: Ensure the safety of all personnel and equipment. MARKING FACTORS 1. Preparation. Evaluate adequacy of preparation including but not limited to the following: MAXIMUM SCORE CREDIT a. Spill cleanup kit available 5 b. Spill contingency plan available 5 c. Spill cleanup team briefing adequate 5 2. Damage Control organization: a. Spillage reported efficiently 5 b. Immediate response adequate 20 c. Message notification adequate 5 d. Spill cleanup personnel level of knowledge in: (1) Use of equipment 10 (2) Use of materials 10 e. Speed and efficiency of the cleanup operation 20 f. Safety of personnel throughout all aspects of the operation 15 MAXIMUM SCORE 100 T0TAL SCORE Figure 1-4.—Spill drill for oil—Continued. damage to components, the system, or the engineering Proficiency in EOCC procedures is maintained plant. through a well-administered training program. Primary The EOCC manuals are available to personnel in training concentrates on the control of single-source their own machinery space so that they can be used as a casualties. These are casualties that may be attributed to the failure or malfunction of a single component or means of self-indoctrination. These manuals also can the failure of piping at a specific point in a system. be used to improve casualty control procedure Advanced training concentrates on the control of techniques for all watch standers. The manuals contain multiple casualties or on conducting a battle problem. documentation to assist engineering personnel in An effective, well-administered EOCC training developing and maintaining maximum proficiency in program must contain, as a minimum, the following controlling casualties to the ship’s propulsion plant. elements: 1-13
FREON SPILL DRILL OBJECTIVE: To train damage control personnel in spill cleanup procedures and equipment use. APPLICABILITY: ALL SUPPORT SERVICES REQUIRED: ACCEPTABLE EQUIVALENCY REQUIREMENTS: None None As approved by ISIC SCENARIO I: Ship is in port. Piping failure leads to complete venting of refrigerant from reefer deck into an AC machinery room. The body of one individual is visible from the access hatch/door. SCENARIO II: Ship is underway. Misalignment of valve causes venting of refrigerant into AC machinery room. The body of one individual is visible from the access hatch/door. PROCEDURES: 1. INITIAL PROCEDURES: a. Spill stopped and reported to DCC b. Ship reports spill via OPREP-3, Navy Blue or Unit SITREP, and Oil Spill Report, OPNAVINST. 5090.1 2. DAMAGE ASSESSMENT: a. Isolate area b. Breakout equipment to retrieve injured personnel c. Determine freon vapor concentration in the air d. Select protective equipment and clothing based on findings 3. REPAIR TASKS: a. Breakout spill cleanup equipment and stage materials in the local area b. Dress out personnel in appropriate protective equipment provided in the spill cleanup kit c. Remove injured personnel and provide first aid d. Contain liquid spill using Wing materials or other equipment e. Stage equipment and materials to maximize efficiency f. Separate contaminated materials for disposal g. Commence cleanup operations using absorbent pads and other equipment h. Collect contaminated materials for reuse or segregate for disposal i. Continue cleaning until no visible sign of liquid is present and vapor concentration level is below 10 percent of the LEL j. Containerize contaminated materials in preparation for transportation and disposal k. Restore unused materials 1. Decontaminate personnel and equipment m. Package residual contaminated materials for disposal Figure 1-5.—Spill drill for freon. 1-14
Figure 1-5.—Spill drill for freon—Continued. Recognition of the symptoms Probable causes Probable effects Preventive actions that may be taken to reduce, elimimte, or control casualties An EOSS package is not intended to be forgotten once it is developed and installed. It offers many advantages to the ship’s operational readiness capabilities and provides detailed, step-by-step sequencing of events for all phases of the engineering plant operation. Because it is work-studied and system-oriented, the EOSS provides the basic information for the optimum use of equipment and systems. It does this by specifying correct procedures tailored for a specific plant configuration. The EOSS is not intended to eliminate the need for skilled plant operators. No program or system can achieve such a goal. The EOSS is a tool for better use of manpower and available skills. Although the EOSS is an excellent tool for shipboard training of personnel, it is primarily a working system for scheduling, controlling, and directing plant operations and casualty control procedures. EOCC VERIFICATION CHECKS Since EOCC procedures are a part of the EOSS, EOCC verification checks should be performed whenever the EOSS is verified. The purpose of verification checks is to validate required changes to EOCC procedures due to authorized SHIPALTs, changes in operating philosophy, or changes in parameters. 1-15
Cold Plant During a ship’s scheduled PMA/SRA/ROH, Naval Warfare Center Ships System Engineering Station (NAVWARCENSSES) Philadelphia will schedule an EOSS verification check (cold plant) approximately 4 weeks prior to the end of the ship’s availability. This will ensure that all system modifications/installations affecting EOSS are completed before the check in order to permit an accurate update. At the end of the verification check a copy of the affected EOSS documentation must be annotated and given to the ship for review and use when approved by the commanding officer. The annotated documents will be used until the final laminated EOSS is received (usually within 12 weeks). Hot Plant The hot plant checks are conducted just as the name describes. This means the plant is fully operational, and the checks are normally performed as a training evolution in the form of casualty control drills. These checks are usually used to fine tune watch-stander efficiency and identify procedural deficiencies. USING THE FEEDBACK SYSTEM Since the EOCC procedures makeup only part of the overall EOSS, we will discuss the use of the EOSS feedback system. The EOSS feedback system is the means by which you may make changes in your EOSS. Any naval activity may originate these requests. The information in this section will cover the proper preparation of feedback reports and other aspects of the feedback system. You must submit feedbacks to accomplish the following: 1. Obtain replacement documents, holders, covers, and twisties. 2. Recommend approval of revisions for: a. Procedural changes to correct document errors. b. Configuration changes for authorized equipment or piping installations. Feedback reports should NOT be submitted just because the EOSS conflicts with other technical guidance. The EOSS always supersedes other guidance! An EOSS feedback should be submitted only when the EOSS is suspected to be in error. Feedback on other documentation such as technical manuals should be submitted via its respective system. Urgent Feedbacks An urgent EOSS feedback report describes a technical discrepancy that could cause damage to equipment or injury to personnel. This category was established to provide rapid resolution of EOSS technical discrepancies related to genuine operational needs. PREPARATION.— Submit urgent feedbacks by priority message to NAVWARCENSSES Philadelphia. Information addresses must include COMNAVSEA- SYSCOM Washington, DC, and your TYCOM. They must contain the following information: 1 . 2. 3. 4. An urgent EOSS feedback number consisting of the year and feedbacks sequential position based upon earlier urgent feedbacks you’ve submitted that year. For example, 93-2; the 93 represents the year and the 2 shows this as the second urgent feedback in 1993. The code number of the EOSS procedure(s) involved (for example, BLF/O21/0585). A detailed description of the problem. The recommended solution citing appropriate justification and any reference documentation. NOTE Review each urgent feedback to be certain the feedbacks a valid urgent submission as defined in the EOSS user’s guide. PROCESSING.— An urgent feedback report is processed in the following manner: 1. 2. The commanding officer authorizes a preliminary pen and ink change to the EOSS pending official guidance from the NAVWARCENSSES. NAVWARCENSSES will provide guidance by message. This is done in 1 to 10 working days depending upon the complexity of the issue. TYCOM monitors and provides assistance as necessary. 1-16
3. 4 . 5 . The commanding officer authorizes the final pen and ink change to EOSS according to message guidance. NAVWARCENSSES forwards advance copies of the corrected document(s) to the ship within 15 working days of the guidance message. NAVWARCENSSES forwards final laminated documents to the ship within 3 months of the guidance message. Routine Feedbacks A routine EOSS feedback is one of two categories, A or B. Category A feedbacks are used to request EOSS materials. Category B feedbacks describe technical discrepancies that are not urgent. Recommended revisions could be an addition or deletion, or a change in the sequence of steps, the parameters, or the diagrams. PREPARATION.— Submit routine feedbacks using the Planned Maintenance System (PMS) form, OPNAV 4790/7B. Each revision requested requires a separate form. If the same change is requested for several documents, it may be explained once and then listed on the documents affected. Rearranging several steps in a document because of a single technical change counts as one revision. On the other hand, more than one technical recommendation in a single document requires more than one form. The printed information on the PMS form does not apply to EOSS. Maintain a separate EOSS feedback system. When using this form for EOSS the following instructions apply: 1. Fill in the ship’s name in the FROM block. 2. In the SERIAL # block, fill in a EOSS feedback number consisting of the year and the feedback’s sequential position. Routine feedbacks must have a different set of feedback numbers than urgent feedbacks. Category A and B routine feedbacks should share the same set of numbers. 3. In the DATE block, fill in the date the feedback is to be mailed. 4. In the TO block, mark the appropriate square for category A or B feedbacks. For category A feedbacks write NAVWARCENSSES Philadelphia in the space provided. 5. Mark the SUBJECT block as follows: a. b. c. In the SYSTEM block, fill in either EOP or EOCC as appropriate. In the SYSCOM MIP block, fill in the document code number (for example, TG/0471/0980 and HBWL/0099/0980). Leave the APL and SYSCOM MRC blocks blank. 6. Leave the DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM block blank except when you are commenting on a procedure that has not been finalized for your use. In that case mark the OTHER block with the words, HOT CHECKS. Situations when this would apply include a package that has been hot checked but not approved and installed, a package that belongs to another ship of the class, or before one ship’s development, 7. Fill in the REMARKS section as follows: a. For category A feedbacks be specific. (1) (2) (3) (4) Documents; specify code number(s) of document(s) needed and the number of laminated (max 2) and unlaminated copies requested. Holders; specify type (single and/or double) and number of each requested. Covers; specify type (EOP and/or EOCC) and number of each requested. Twisties; specify size (4-3/4", 5-3/4", or 8") and number-of each requested. b. For category B feedbacks, be as clear as possible. The more precise you are, the faster a response can be generated (1) (2) (3) (4) Identify the location of the problem in the EOSS document. Describe the problem and recommend a solution. Reference your justification for the change where applicable. Provide a copy of the reference pages that support your recommendation Use the unlaminated logroom copy, make a photocopy of the procedure, and mark it to reflect your recommendation Attach a duplicate of the unlaminated copy to the 4790/7B form. Do not use a yellow marker because it will not photocopy. Do not obscure the original 1-17
text or the reference, because this will cause a delay in answering your request. 8. In the signature blocks, indicate with an asterisk* the person who would serve as the best point of contact. Make sure the name is legible and include phone numbers when possible. The 3-M COORDINATOR block must be signed by the EOSS coordinator. Note that the EOSS feedback system is separate from the PMS system. The distribution of the feedback copies is as follows: a. b. c. White, yellow, and pink copies to NAVWARCENSSES Philadelphia for category A feedbacks or to the TYCOM for category B feedbacks. If the TYCOM determines that the NAVWARCENSSES action is appropriate, they will forward the white and yellow copies to NAVWARCENSSES. The white copy will be returned with the requested material for category A feedbacks. No copies will be returned for category B feedbacks. The blue copy is retained by the EOSS coordinate. The green copy is retained by the originating work center. PROCESSING.— Feedbacks are processed as quickly as possible. Generally, the more compre- hensively prepared a feedback is, the easier it is to answer. Do all the homework you can before submitting a feedback. 1. Category A feedbacks are sent to NAVWARCENSSES. The items requested are forwarded within 21 working days of the request receipt. 2. Category B feedbacks are screened by the TYCOM and may be answered by them and returned to you. This could occur when your recommended change is not according to their policy or EOSS program policy. When your TYCOM forwards the feedback to NAVWARCENSSES, there are three possible responses. a. Concur—Advance copies of the revised document(s) will be forwarded. b. Do not concur—An explanation of the reason for nonconcurrence will be c. forwarded within 21 working days of receipt. Other—Advance and final copies will be forwarded as with concur items. An explanation of the partial concurrence will accompany the advance copies. 3. Annotations for routine feedbacks are limited to documenting authorized configuration changes. Routine procedural/parameter pen and ink changes are not authorized. Make Local Changes to Manuals Local changes to EOSS are NOT AUTHORIZED except as described in section 4 of chapter 1 of the EOSS User’s Guide. Only NAV- WARCENSSES can approve and issue changes to the NAVSEA-installed EOSS. PREPARE FULL POWER AND ECONOMY TRIAL REPORTS As a GS supervisor, full power and economy trials will be a very important part of your responsibilities. Through proper leadership and training these trials can be proof of your management skills. They are proof of your ability to maintain your propulsion equipment at peak levels of performance. Although FXP-4 mobility (MOB) exercises delineate general requirements for conducting engineering trials, inconsistencies have developed among different naval commands in levying different requirements for full power and economy trials for nonnuclear surface ships. Full power and economy trial requirements are based partially on calculations and partially on design requirements. It is not economically feasible to conduct full-scale trials to document every possible condition. Therefore, to avoid confusion, the reporting system for trial results is found in OPNAVINST 9094.1, Full Power and Economy Trial Requirements for Non-nuclear Surface Ship Classes. In this section we will briefly discuss the performance of these trials and the processing of data needed to complete the required reports. FULL POWER TRIALS A full power trial must be conducted annually for a minimum duration of one hour and at a minimum depth of water as prescribed in NSTM, chapter 094. All full 1-18
power trials shall be conducted with a minimum 75 percent liquid load at the commencement of the trial. During the trials, fleet and type commanders must ensure machinery alignments are according to heat balance diagrams, propulsion operating guides, and applicable technical documentation. Compile Information The information compiled during the full power trial must be entered on standard forms used for all gas turbine-powered ships. All the following forms except the one shown in figure 1-9 are available through normal supply channels according to NAVSUP P-2002. Figure 1-6 is the trial transmittal letter (cover sheet), OPNAV form 9094/1A, NSN 0107-LF-090-9405. Figure 1-7 is sheet 1 of 2 of the trial data form, OPNAV form 9094/1D, NSN 0107-LF-090-9440. Figure 1-8 is sheet 2 of 2 of the trial data form, OPNAV form 9094/1D, NSN 0107-LF-090-9445. View A shows plant condition data for 1A GTE, while view B shows data for 1B GTE. The form shown in figure 1-9 is not available in the supply system, but it is the standard format used to report the actual propulsion plant condition to the chief observer before a full power or even an economy trial commences. Disseminate Information For you to properly disseminate the information, you must be familiar with all operating characteristics of your plant. In other words, you need to go back to the basics and use all the guidelines provided in the EOSS and applicable technical manuals. If the readings are improperly disseminated, it could mean the difference between a satisfactory or unsatisfactory trial. ECONOMY TRIALS Economy trials in most cases will be scheduled on the same day as the full power trials. They are usually scheduled in this manner because of the ship’s competitive exercise schedule and the availability of observers. Just because these trials are usually conducted together does not mean their accomplishment periodicity is the same. Economy trial periodicity is established by your fleet and type commanders. Fleet and type commanders also must be sure machinery alignments during economy trials conform to propulsion operating guides and NAVSEA, SL101-AA-GYD-010, Energy Conservation. All the economy trial report forms are the same as those used for the full power trials. Refer again to figures 1-6 through 1-8. The forms are the same, but the information entered in the equipment operating sections of these forms may differ. However, if both trials are accomplished on the same day, the information provided on the form shown in figure 1-9 will be the same. DRAFT REPORTS Reports of all satisfactory and unsatisfactory engineering trials must be provided to Commander, Naval Sea Systems Command (SEA56X1). The report of an unsatisfactory trial is particularly important. It provides information on design or material problems that preclude a successful trial. MARINE GAS TURBINE EQUIPMENT LOGBOOKS The Navy deploys gas turbine equipment in propulsion and ship-services systems in its surface fleet. Selection of gas turbine equipment for these systems reflects a commitment to increase ship availability through reduction in system downtime. Gas turbine equipment combines acceptable reliability and onboard maintenance features with ease of removal and replacement. System downtime and lower shipboard manning levels have been realized through properly directed maintenance and logistic support, and reliability and maintainability improvement efforts. Service records, as described in this section, are used to retain significant historical operating and maintenance data of gas turbine equipment transferred between shipboard installations and repair or rework facilities. Service records provide a consolidated source of background information available to personnel conducting and analyzing maintenance activity. All gas turbine records are designed according to the 3-M Maintenance Data System (MDS) organizational (ship) maintenance data collection or reporting requirements. They are particularly important because of the interface in marine gas turbine equipment support between shipboard organizational maintenance and shore-based depot maintenance. The use of service records and logbooks is similar to the approach applied successfully in NAVAIR for many years in the aircraft jet engine community. 1-19
Figure 1-6.—Engineering trial report transmittal letter. 1-20
Figure 1-7.—Engineering trial report data, sheet 1 of 2. 1-21
Figure 1-8.—Engineering trial report data, sheet 2 of 2.
Figure 1-9.—Propulsion plant condition report
The Navy’s policy is, all activities having custody of marine gas turbine equipment, that is, single-shaft engine assemblies or modular engine assemblies (major sections of the engine that are replaceable), associated components, accessories, and ancillary equipment, must maintain service records in a proper and up-to-date status. REVIEW MGTE LOG BOOKS (MGTEL) A periodic review of the MGTEL should be done and as a GS supervisor you may be tasked with this job. In the Gas Turbine Systems Technician (Mechanical) 2 and Gas Turbine Systems Technician (Electrical) 2 training manuals you were told the MGTEL is a hardcover book that houses all the marine gas turbine equipment service records (MGTESRs). You were also given a basic description of each record sheet and the type of information found on each sheet that makes up the various sections of the MGTEL. In addition to the information provided in the rate training manuals and NSTM, chapter 234, you can use this sample checklist to follow when you conduct a review of your logbooks. The numbers listed at the end of each statement or question are reference paragraphs from NSTM, chapter 234. 1 . 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8 . 9. 10. 11 . 12. 13 . Are receipts of engines signed for? 234-8.40 Are operating times logged monthly (minimum)? 234-8.44 Are operating times up to date? 234-8.44 Is there a special inspection page? 234-8.51 Is there a conditional inspection page? 234-8.51 Are required inspections entered (as per bulletins, casualties, pre-delivery, and such)? 234-8.50/51 Is there a gas turbine change (GTC) 234-8.55 Is there a GTC revision/amendment 234-8.60 Is there a gas turbine bulletin (GTB) 234-8.55 Is there a GTB revision/amendment 234-8.62 page? page? page? page? Are GTCs in numerical sequence? 234-8.62 Are GTBs in numerical sequence? 234-8.62 Do GTCs contain action categories? 234-8.57 14 .. 15 .. 16 .. 17 .. 18 . 19 . 20. . 21 .. 22. 23.. 24.. 25 . 26. 27. 28. 29. Do GTCs contain status codes? 234-8.62 Do GTCs contain a brief description? 234-8.62 Do GTBs contain action categories? 234-8.57 Do GTBs contain status codes? 234-8.62 Do GTBs contain brief descriptions? 234-8.62 Is there a complete list of technical directives issued? IAW latest zero index. Does the revisions issued column reflect the revisions/amendments issued? 234-8.60 Are NINC or NIS entries in pencil? 234-8.62.3.b Are INC entries in ink or typed? 234-8.30 Does the selected component record (SCR) card/supplemental record indicate INC or NINC for directives issued? 234-8.61 Does the SCR page reflect current inventory? 234-8.66 Is the removal/replacement data correct on the SCR cards? 234-8.66 Is the total equipment count consistent with operating log entries? 234-8.67 Are “hours” or “start” entries followed by “H” or “S”? Fig. 234-8.28K Is there a JCN on the SCR card for replaced components? 234-8.75 Is pertinent information for which no other place has been provided recorded on the miscellaneous history page? 234-8.64 UPDATE MGTE SERVICE AND OPERATING RECORDS Updating MGTE service and operating records is normally performed by the log custodian. The log custodian is usually the main propulsion assistant (MPA). Even though the MPA is the log custodian, you may still be tasked to make updates to the logs. In any case, if you follow the guide provided in the next section you will know what entries are required and the proper way to make the update. WHB OPERATING AND TREATMENT RECORDS Even though the WHBs installed on your ship are considered auxiliary equipment, they play a very important role in the ship’s ability to remain 1-24
self-sufficient. That’s why close scrutiny of their operating and treatment records is so important. The importance of maintaining accurate WHB operating records, boiler water and feedwater chemistry logs and records must not be underestimated. The engineer officer and assistants use the data in these records to measure the performance, stability, efficiency, and state of material readiness of the engineering plant. Remember, the decision-making process involved in effective WHB operations and the water chemistry program aboard your ship is supported by the information contained in these records. To be an effective engineer and supervisor, you should be familiar with the purpose, content, and general procedures to properly review and train your personnel to maintain each of these records. UPDATE WHB OPERATING RECORDS WHB operating records information is derived and compiled from several different logs and inspection reports. Basic boiler information is recorded in the engineering log as events occur. These events normally include start-ups, shutdowns, and blowdowns. However, the primary log where the majority of information is compiled is the WHB Boiler Water Chemistry Worksheet/Log. This log is updated as events occur and is closed out on a daily basis. Basically, all maintenance performed on the boiler and its operating systems, chemical treatments, and operating hours are entered in either the Remarks section or the Boiler Data section on the backside of the WHB Boiler Water Chemistry Worksheet/Log. The last source of boiler status information that we will discuss is the Boiler Inspection and Repair Management Information System (BIRMIS) report. This system’s purpose is to enhance the value of auxiliary boiler inspections. The BIRMIS report contains useful information concerning the health of your WHB. This report is filled out by the boiler inspector at the completion of any standard or emergent boiler inspection. As a supervisor you must understand the information provided in this report so you can effectively plan (schedule) and correct the listed discrepancies. In figure 1-10 of this next section, there is a sample of a BIRMIS report. This sample report should help you identify and understand the information provided. As you can see, the BIRMIS report is broken down into three distinct sections. This sample report is representative of the inspection of the No. 3 WHB. The first section is the cover sheet and some standard information that you provide to the inspector. The second section is for inspector comments. In this sample, the inspector chose to provide a list of references that would be used as guidelines to perform the inspection. The third section contains (from left to right) the item (component) inspected, the number of discrepancies noted (entry condition), the recommended repair, and the deficiency status code. For clarification and standardization, the BIRMIS system uses set codes to identify each boiler component and subcomponents being inspected. As in the sample form, the C represents the boiler tubes (primary), and the Cl and Cll represent specific sections of the tubes. And finally, the entry condition is the sequential listing of each discrepancy found for that component. UPDATE WHB WATER TREATMENT RECORDS As a GS supervisor you must become more familiar with updating and reviewing WHB water treatment records. Depending on your assignment within the engineering department and if your ship has boilers, you will be tasked either daily or intermittently with updating and reviewing these records. In the remainder of this section you will find two basic check sheets (figs. 1-11 and 1-12) that you can use to properly review the WHB water treatment records. These check sheets are not mandatory, but the information is very helpful. This information was taken directly from an NSTM and the numbers listed at the end of each question should be a help to you. SUMMARY In this chapter we have discussed various programs, reports, and records needed by GS supervisors. The titles of the different sections of this chapter may sound like many of those presented in some engineering administration publications. Even though the topics are in other publications, the information in this chapter is specific togas turbine-powered ships. Throughout this chapter you have been referred to the EOSS, applicable technical manuals, or the PMS for specific information. You must use these references to guide you through the procedures. Use of the EOSS, technical manuals, and the PMS will help you make the proper decisions to best handle the duties of a GS supervisor. 1-25
Figure 1-10.—Sample BIRMIS report. 1-26
Figure 1-10.—Sample BIRMIS report—Continued. 1-27
Figure 1-10.—Sample BIRMIS report—Continued. 1-28
Figure 1-11.—Boiler water chemistry check sheets. 1-29
Figure 1-12.—Feedwater chemistry check sheets. 1-30
Figure 1-13.—Handout #l for sample lesson plan. 1-31
Figure 1-13.—Handout #l for sample lesson plan—Continued. 1-32
Figure 1-13.—Handout #1 for sample lesson plan—Continued. 1-33
Figure 1-13.—Handout #l for sample lesson plan—Conthmed. 1-34
CHAPTER 2 GAS TURBINE MAINTENANCE This chapter will cover object damage, borescope inspection, troubleshooting, and maintenance of the LM2500 and the Allison 501-K series of GTEs. The majority of this chapter deals with the LM2500 GTE damage evaluation. The last part of this chapter is on proper preservation and corrosion control methods for maintaining all GTEs in peak operating status. OBJECT DAMAGE There are two basic types of object damage GS supervisors see. One of the most damaging gas turbine casualties, and one of the easiest to prevent, is foreign object damage (FOD). In this section we will discuss the hazards of FOD and some of the ways to prevent it. The other type of object damage that can cause failure of a GTE is domestic object damage (DOD). HAZARDS The effects of object damage and the hazards involved vary greatly with the size and location of the object ingested. Small dents and abrasions may cause little or no damage. However, if a large enough object is ingested by the engine, severe internal damage will result. Large, soft items (such as paper) can clog the FOD screen, causing a loss of power and elevated turbine inlet temperatures. The other type of damage that was mentioned is DOD. DOD occurs when an internal object from the engine breaks loose and causes impact damage to the engine. PREVENTION To prevent FOD to engines while working in and around intake and plenum areas, you and your personnel must observe the following safety precautions: —When performing maintenance inside the intake areas, always-follow all written guidelines found in the EOP. Remember to remove all loose objects from your person. You must also account for all tools and equipment used in the intake. After completing your work, inspect the intake for cleanliness, and reinventory the tools and equipment before securing the accesses. —Periodically inspect all intakes for cleanliness, the state of preservation, and the condition of the FOD screens. Correct any abnormal conditions. The frequency of inspection will depend on the operating conditions, PMS requirements, and engineering department instructions. Remember, the PMS only provides minimum standards. PMS can always be exceeded if you or your superiors deem it necessary. —When inspecting the intakes, be sure that the areas around the blow-in doors are kept clear of loose gear and debris that could be ingested if the blow-in doors are activated. To prevent DOD damage, you and your personnel need to follow a strict regiment of cleaning and inspections (internal and external). This attention to detail, as described in the next two paragraphs, is absolutely necessary to avoid DOD damage. —Make sure the engine is properly cleaned inside and out. Always following the standards in the PMS and the manufacturer’s technical manual. Cleanliness is an important factor in the fight against corrosion. Corrosion control (discussed later in this chapter) also can reduce the chances of component failures that can lead to DOD. —Perform frequent external and internal GTE inspections to reduce the possibilities of DOD occurrences. GTE external inspections are very important. Locating loose, missing, or broken external components (VSV retaining nuts) during these inspections is a significant factor in preventing damage. —Using borescope inspections aids in determining the extent and prevention of DOD. The most frequent damage is identified as potential component failures (blade stress cracks). BORESCOPE INSPECTIONS Borescope inspection requirements and procedures are found on the maintenance requirement card (MRC). These cards contain all the basic information necessary to conduct an inspection. Included on the MRCs are the serviceability limits and a list of conditions that require an inspection. Borescope inspections are usually performed semiannually or when the engine has been operated beyond the allowable limits listed on the MRC. 2-1